[MADview]
[World] - Why bother "Seeking carbon offsets for global warming" - we need more than that
Written by madnilk Thursday, 22 April 2010 00:48
Well I don't know about this one - there lots of thing being said on the Net about future possibility of some new gas tax existence. People whom talking about buying a carbon offset to ease any guilt - what kind of guilt, you name it!!
Some might said that there are scam or even hideous scheme to suck people money, by standing behind green theme. Do you really think that by planning some 10-100 acre can restore what have been chop down deep down in the jungle. Building up some windmill can restore the lost of what we had done this past few centuries.
Things that these people said and done - are too good to be true. What are they thinking, honestly?
Some makes provocation toward other people - pointing up and arguing any upraise issues.
My only solution is simple - do it ourselves. We need more than just GAS TAX or what ever they might call it!! Consult the help of people, community and government. Just imagine with the world population now day - what will happen if every single house have their own approach toward preserving the nature (in many way).
Why bother about gas or carbon emission if we never concern about the functionality of nature. Even a polluted river and ocean can give effect on global warming!! It not enough to beware about your so call "offset" - being concern and caring can be add up for better anti "warming"
p/s: always start from the basic - which we must educate our future retainer of this world - children of hope!! Then we can talk about what ever scheme that "they" have in mind.
[World] - Should Companies Restrict Employees Use of Social Network?
Written by madnilk Sunday, 26 April 2009 23:05
I read many articles that relates with this topic, which also comes in with many feedback from the user. Such addictive manners are well known for every single person alive (if they are one of permanent online resident).
From my view, lots of the online resident are self-employ and have their own timetable in term of organizing every single activities. They don't concern about boss or employer interest.
I'm here to talk about people whom working for 'someone' at office cubicle but in the same time spending their time making an effort within Social Networks. It is hard to comment cause I'm one of them (I never had any Internet access at the office anyway!!). How about they who does?
This crucial matter is under vast cover up everywhere globally. Incident why people get caught up during 'session', exposing things that confidential; and many more.This should not be happening cause when we said about Social network is all about individual, unless the 'account' are set up for company or corporate marketing purposes.
It is about a concept of Social Network being use as good tool rather than recklessly abandoning it flawless toward misbehave actions.Things that can be said and done are full list of possibilities when we point out toward the benefits of Social Networks services. Companies should know what is the pro and cons aspects before allowing their fellow workers deals up with the issue.
'They' should consult professional advices before making leap step toward Social Network cold-fusion integration within their company policies. One things that I do know - Social Networks restrictions is a must for company with no ideas of what after effect can it bring upon their precious benchmarks and branding.
Social Network are meant for they who know their goal and target, which in the same time acknowledge the disastrous effects of mishandle. Only allow Social Networks within the company if you eager to bear with the effect, either if it good or bad.
[World] - AIG executives draining people money? More bailout failure.
Written by madnilk Tuesday, 17 March 2009 21:13
What happen to AIG? Such futile action during these day. This article caught my sight while surfing yahoo. Back then it was Wall Street and now AIG. [Read More]
I like to phrase President Barack Obama statement, "I mean, how do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?"
What they really have in mind (AIG executives) while making their decision of distributing bonuses while out there people are living within tent and many other homeless due to last year economic crisis after effect. Such futile action should never been made if they care about tax payers that paid up the bailout.
"Obviously, maybe they ought to be removed," the Iowa Republican said. "But I would suggest the first thing that would make me feel a little bit better toward them if they'd follow the Japanese example and come before the American people and take that deep bow and say, I'm sorry, and then either do one of two things: resign or go commit suicide."I do agree with Iowa Republican - take the responsibility and stood up for the consequences. People are not so bad asking for other to die but please be responsible by not making such waste on the money/bonuses. Don't make irresponsible actions.
Never make people rage - make wise decisions and financial organization if things relate with people money, when they come in numbers you will never expect the consequences.
Page 1 of 2
